Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 49-232 – Lists of impaired waters; data requirements; rules

A. At least once every five years, the department shall prepare a list of impaired WOTUS to comply with section 303(d) of the clean water act (33 United States Code section 1313(d)). The department shall provide public notice and allow for comment on a draft list of impaired WOTUS prior to its submission to the United States environmental protection agency. The department shall prepare written responses to comments received on the draft list. The department shall publish the list of impaired WOTUS that it plans to submit initially to the regional administrator and a summary of the responses to comments on the draft list in the Arizona administrative register at least forty-five days before submission of the list to the regional administrator. Publication of the list in the Arizona administrative register is an appealable agency action pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10 that may be appealed by any party that submitted written comments on the draft list. If the department receives a notice of appeal of a listing pursuant to section 41.1092.03 within forty-five days after the publication of the list in the Arizona administrative register, the department shall not include the challenged listing in its initial submission to the regional administrator. The department may subsequently submit the challenged listing to the regional administrator if the listing is upheld in the director’s final administrative decision pursuant to section 41-1092.08, or if the challenge to the listing is withdrawn prior to a final administrative decision.
B. On or before December 31, 2022 and at least once every five years thereafter, the department shall prepare a list of impaired non-WOTUS protected surface waters. The department shall provide public notice and opportunity to comment on a draft list of impaired non-WOTUS protected surface waters prepared under this subsection. The department shall prepare written responses to comments received on the draft list. The department shall publish the list of impaired non-WOTUS protected surface waters and a summary of the responses to comments on the draft list in the Arizona administrative register. Publication of the list in the Arizona administrative register is an appealable agency action pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10 and may be appealed by any party that submitted written comments on the draft list.
C. In determining whether a water is impaired, the department shall consider only reasonably current credible and scientifically defensible data that the department has collected or has received from another source. Results of water sampling or other assessments of water quality, including physical or biological health, shall be considered credible and scientifically defensible data only if the department has determined all of the following:
1. 1. Appropriate quality assurance and quality control procedures were followed and documented in collecting and analyzing the data.
2. 2. The samples or analyses are representative of water quality conditions at the time the data was collected.
3. 3. The data consists of an adequate number of samples based on the nature of the water in question and the parameters being analyzed.
4. 4. The method of sampling and analysis, including analytical, statistical and modeling methods, is generally accepted and validated in the scientific community as appropriate for use in assessing the condition of the water.
D. The department shall adopt by rule the methodology to be used in identifying waters as impaired. The rules shall specify all of the following:
1. 1. Minimum data requirements and quality assurance and quality control requirements that are consistent with subsection C of this section and that must be satisfied in order for the data to serve as the basis for listing and delisting decisions.
2. 2. Appropriate sampling, analytical and scientific techniques that may be used in assessing whether a water is impaired.
3. 3. Any statistical or modeling techniques that the department uses to assess or interpret data.
4. 4. Criteria for including and removing waters from the list of impaired waters, including any implementation procedures developed pursuant to subsection G of this section. The criteria for removing a water from the list of impaired waters shall not be any more stringent than the criteria for adding a water to that list.
E. In assessing whether a water is impaired, the department shall consider the data available in light of the nature of the water in question, including whether the water is an ephemeral water. A water in which pollutant loadings from naturally occurring conditions alone are sufficient to cause a violation of applicable surface water quality standards shall not be listed as impaired.
F. If the department has adopted a numeric surface water quality standard for a pollutant and that standard is not being exceeded in a water, the department shall not list the water as impaired based on a conclusion that the pollutant causes a violation of a narrative or biological standard unless:
1. 1. The department has determined that the numeric standard is insufficient to protect water quality.
2. 2. The department has identified specific reasons that are appropriate for the water in question, that are based on generally accepted scientific principles and that support the department's determination.
G. Before listing a water as impaired based on a violation of a narrative or biological surface water quality standard and after providing an opportunity for public notice and comment, the department shall adopt implementation procedures that specifically identify the objective basis for determining that a violation of the narrative or biological criterion exists. A total maximum daily load designed to achieve compliance with a narrative or biological surface water quality standard shall not be adopted until the implementation procedure for the narrative or biological surface water quality standard has been adopted.
H. On request, the department shall make available to the public data used to support the listing of a water as impaired and may charge a reasonable fee to persons requesting the data.
I. By January 1, 2002, the department shall review the list of waters identified as impaired as of January 1, 2000 to determine whether the data that supports the listing of those waters complies with this section. If the data that supports a listing does not comply with this section, the listed water shall not be included on future lists submitted to the United States environmental protection agency pursuant to 33 United States Code section 1313(d) unless in the interim data that satisfies the requirements of this section has been collected or received by the department.
J. The department shall add a water to or remove a water from the list using the process described in subsection A or B of this section outside of the normal listing cycle if it collects or receives credible and scientifically defensible data that satisfies the requirements of this section and that demonstrates that the current quality of the water is such that it should be removed from or added to the list. A listed water may no longer warrant classification as impaired or an unlisted water may be identified as impaired if the applicable surface water quality standards, implementation procedures or designated uses have changed or if there is a change in water quality.
K. The director shall apply the rules adopted pursuant to subsection D of this section for identification of impaired waters to non-WOTUS protected surface waters until specifically changed by rule. The director shall amend rules to update the impaired waters identification rules within one year after adopting surface water quality standards for non-WOTUS protected surface waters pursuant to section 49-221, subsection A, paragraph 2.