1. 1. Prior conduct resulting in discipline;
2. 2. Dishonest or self-serving motive;
3. 3. Amount of experience as an interpreter;
4. 4. Bad faith obstruction of the disciplinary proceeding by intentionally failing to comply with rules or orders of the Commission;
5. 5. Submission of false evidence, false statements, or other deceptive practices during the investigative or disciplinary process;
6. 6. Refusal to acknowledge wrongful nature of conduct;
7. 7. Degree of harm resulting from the conduct; and
8. 8. Whether harm resulting from the conduct was cured.

After an opportunity for hearing and a Commission determination that a licensee violated A.R.S. Title 36, Chapter 17.1, or this Chapter, the Commission shall consider the following factors to determine the degree of discipline to impose under A.R.S. § 36-1976(A):

Historical Note

Adopted effective May 12, 1986 (Supp. 86-3). Section renumbered to R9-26-203 by final rulemaking at 6 A.A.R. 3827, effective September 15, 2000 (Supp. 00-3). New Section R9-26-304 renumbered from R9-26-517 and amended by final rulemaking at 22 A.A.R. 1675, effective August 15, 2016 (Supp. 16-2).