- (a) The Director of the Office of the Arkansas Lottery, or a hearing officer designated by him or her, shall have the exclusive authority to decide all protests.
- (b) After submittal of a timely protest and prior to issuance of a written decision to that protest, the petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity to discuss with the director the issues giving rise to the protest.
(c)
- (1) Before agreeing to settle any protest by the award of costs, the director shall consult the Attorney General and the Office of the Arkansas Lottery staff attorney.
- (2) The award of costs shall be allowed only to compensate a petitioner for reasonable expenses incurred in preparation and submission of a bid or proposal for which the petitioner was wrongfully denied a contract award.
(3) The costs which are allowable shall be those which the petitioner is able to prove that are incurred in preparation and submission of the bid or proposal in question, but exclude travel and production costs that may result from participation in:
- (A) Prebid conferences;
- (B) Attending on-site inspections; and
- (C) Demonstrations or presentations made in responding to formal solicitations issued by the state.
- (4) A petitioner may not recover profit which it anticipates would have been made if the petitioner had been awarded the major procurement contract.
- (5) Attorney's fees associated with the filing and prosecution of the protest are not recoverable.
(d)
- (1) If the protest is not resolved by mutual agreement, the director or hearing officer shall issue a written decision within thirty (30) calendar days after a protest has been filed.
(2) The decision shall include a:
- (A) Brief description of the claim;
- (B) Reference to the pertinent contract provision;
- (C) Brief statement of the factual and legal issues; and
- (D) Statement of the director’s or hearing officer's decision, with supporting rationale and the remedial action or award, if any.
(e) The director or hearing officer shall furnish a copy of the decision to the petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by any other method that provides written evidence of delivery, such as hand delivery by:
- (1) Courier;
- (2) Express mail; or
- (3) Overnight express courier.
(f)
- (1) The time limit for decisions set forth in subsection (d) of this section may be extended by the director or hearing office for good cause for a reasonable time not to exceed thirty (30) additional calendar days.
- (2) The director or hearing officer shall notify the petitioner in writing that the time for the issuance of a decision has been extended and the date by which a decision will be issued.
- (g) If the director or hearing officer fails to issue a decision within the time limits set forth in subsection (d) or subsection (f) of this section, the petitioner may proceed as if the director or hearing officer had issued an adverse decision.
(h)
- (1) In lieu of a written decision, the director may, in his or her sole discretion, within thirty (30) calendar days after a protest is filed, give written notice to the petitioner that the protest shall be resolved by a hearing conducted by the director or hearing officer pursuant to the procedures for hearing set forth in 23 CAR § 372-407.
- (2) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the office may at any time on its own motion direct that a protest be resolved by a hearing conducted by the director or hearing officer pursuant to the procedures for hearing set forth in 23 CAR § 372-407.
- (i) Nothing in this subpart shall prohibit a contractor who is also an aggrieved person or petitioner from submitting an invoice to the office for final payment after the work is completed and accepted.
- (j) Pending claims shall not delay payment for undisputed amounts from the office to a contractor who is also an aggrieved person or petitioner.