Zulpo v. State
415 S.W.2d 653
Tex. Crim. App.
1967
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is indecent exposure to a child; the punishment, 10 years.

Except for the fact that the exposure was to different girls under 16 years of age, the facts and the grounds of error are not materially different from those before us in the appeal of the same appellant in Zulpo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 415 S.W.2d 650, this day decided. The opinion in the said companion case controls the disposition of this appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.





Concurrence in Part

ONION, Judge.

(Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part).

For the same reasons stated in our opinion in Zulpo v. State, 415 S.W.2d 650, this day decided, Judge MORRISON and this writer concur in the result reached, but we cannot agree that oral stipulations, not in accordance in Article 1.15, C.C.P., may be considered in passing upon the sufficiency of the evidence.