*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ZOND LLC, Appellant v.
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., THE GILLETTE
COMPANY, Appellees ______________________ 2016-1393, 2016-1394, 2016-1395, 2016-1398 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-00807, IPR2014-00808, IPR2014-00846, IPR2014-00849, IPR2014-00972, IPR2014-00973, IPR2014-00974, IPR2014-00975, IPR2014-01065, IPR2014-01067, IPR2014-01099, IPR2014-01100.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ T AREK N. F AHMI , Ascenda Law Group, PC, San Jose, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by H OLLY J. A TKINSON .
M ARK G. M ATUSCHAK , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for all appellees. Appellee The Gillette Company also represented by M ARK C HRISTOPHER F LEMING , E RIC F LETCHER ; D AVID L ANGDON C AVANAUGH , Washington, DC.
R YAN K EN Y AGURA , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los An- geles, CA, for appellee Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Also represented by X IN -Y I Z HOU ; B RADLEY G ARCIA , Washing- ton, DC.
J OHN J OSEPH F ELDHAUS , Foley & Lardner LLP, Wash- ington, DC, for appellees Renesas Electronics Corpora- tion, Renesas Electronics America, Inc. Also represented by P AVAN K UMAR A GARWAL , G EORGE E LLSWORTH Q UILLIN ; M ICHAEL R OBERT H OUSTON , Chicago, IL.
______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :
P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and D YK , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT January 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court