History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zollinger v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.
388 Pa. 299
Pa.
1957
Check Treatment

Opinion

Per Curiam,

From the order of the court below, resolving the venue of the separate causes of action of the two plaintiffs (joined in one complaint), the plaintiffs have taken but a single appeal. The joint appeal was improperly taken; two appeals, one by each plaintiff, were required: see Shaw v. Plains Township, 270 Pa. 387, 388, 113 A. 410. Nor do the circumstances admit of a non pros as to the one plaintiff, leaving the appeal as that of the other. As the appeal must therefore be quashed, we do not get to the question whether the amount in controversy was sufficient to give this court appellate jurisdiction.

Appeal quashed.

Case Details

Case Name: Zollinger v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 22, 1957
Citation: 388 Pa. 299
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 62
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.