14 Fla. 43 | Fla. | 1871
delivered the opinion of thé court..
The order appealed from - purports to have been granted upon an inspection of the records of the court in two actions •referred to, and the answer of the sheriff as to certain mon*eys in his hands. The order directed the money to be paid. to one of the judgment creditors.
We do not find that' the records in the actions referred to,-
We might have directed a proper return to be made, if the certificate to the paper on file here had been sufficient. It merely certifies that “the foregoing are true copies of the original,” &c., and of course does not purport to embrace the necessary papers and records. There is, therefore, nothing upon which to found a certiorari to supply the absent-records.
The only order we can make under the circumstances is to strike the case from the docket. , (See Caulk, adm’r, vs. Fox, 13 Fla., 147.).
Ordered accordingly.