Zink v. California State Board of Equalization, 499 U.S. 903

Zink v. California State Board of Equalization

499 U.S. 903 | SCOTUS | 1991

Lead Opinion

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 25, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.