History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zimmerman v. State
554 So. 2d 670
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1990
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s sentence which was an upward departure from the presumptive guidelines sentence. The defendant’s negotiated plea agreement was a valid reason upon which to base a departure sentence. Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1988).

Appellant also argues that the trial court erred in failing to rule upon his pro se motion for jail time credit. This motion may not have come to the court’s attention until after appellant had filed his notice of appeal. Accordingly, this opinion is without prejudice to appellant to renew the motion after our mandate has issued.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Zimmerman v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 5, 1990
Citation: 554 So. 2d 670
Docket Number: No. 89-00675
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.