History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zientara v. Zientara
26 N.Y.2d 707
NY
1970
Check Treatment

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. A stipulation for judgment absolute may not be given in a matrimonial action. (See, e. g., Friedman v. Friedman, 240 N. Y. 608; Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150; Rodgers v. Rodgers, 304 N. Y. 591; see, also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 286-287; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5601.13.)

Case Details

Case Name: Zientara v. Zientara
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 21, 1970
Citation: 26 N.Y.2d 707
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.