midpage

Ziegler v. PhillipsZiegler v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 3, 1920
No. 22,000
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Cttbiam
PlSK CtTBIAM.

Action for personal injuries occasioned by the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff had ‍​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‍a verdict and defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for judgment or a new trial. The principal contention of appellant is that the ‍​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‍evidence conclusively shows contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff and that the court erred in not directing a verdict for defendant. In that contention we ‍​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‍do not eoncui‘. A discussion of the evidence will serve no useful purpose. It presented a question of fact for the jury. The negligence of ‍​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‍defendant is conceded, at least the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict in that respect is not challenged. The record presents no errors ‍​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‍justifying a new trial, and the verdict is not excessive in amount.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ziegler v. Phillips
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Dec 3, 1920
Citations: 180 N.W. 37; 147 Minn. 461; 1920 Minn. LEXIS 777; No. 22,000
Docket Number: No. 22,000
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
Log In