History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ziech v. Hehard
67 Ill. App. 97
Ill. App. Ct.
1896
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion ok the Court.

The record fails to show what negligence, if any, the defendant was guilty of, which resulted in the accident.

The table fell, but that the fall was the result of negligence on the part of the defendant, does not appear.

The action of negligence is based upon a neglect of duty, and both the duty and the neglect must be proven by the plaintiff. R. R. Co. v. Evans, 88 Ill. 63; R. R. Co. v. Mock, 88 Ill. 87; R. R. Co. v..Wellhoener, 72 Ill. 60; Conlon v. Bailey, 58 Ill. App. 261; De La Vergne Refrigerator Co. v. McLeroth, 60 Ill. App. 529; R. R. Co. v. Grimes, 13 Ill. 585; Williams v. R. R. Co., 135 Ill. 491; Joliet Steel Co. v. Shields, 146 Ill. 603; Sack v. Dolese, 137 Ill. 129.

The plaintiff having failed to show that the deceased was injured in consequence of the neglect of the defendant, the jury was properly instructed to find for the defendant.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ziech v. Hehard
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Nov 19, 1896
Citation: 67 Ill. App. 97
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.