History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zevely v. Sinclair
225 A.D. 652
N.Y. App. Div.
1928
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order so far as appealed from should be modified so as to require the plaintiff to furnish the numbers of the stock certificates and the number of shares represented by each certificate, within thirty days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon. If the plaintiff is without information, *653she may so state under oath in lieu thereof, and the reason why such information cannot be obtained by her. The plaintiff, however, will be required to furnish such information to the defendant, if such be thereafter obtained, any time before the action is called for trial. As so modified the order should be affirmed, without costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.






Concurrence Opinion

Dowling, P. J.

I concur; but I do so as to the refusal to order particulars to be furnished of the items of paragraph 3 of the complaint, upon the ground that, in my opinion, under said allegation plaintiff is limited to proof of delivery by her testate personally. Order modified as indicated in opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Zevely v. Sinclair
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1928
Citation: 225 A.D. 652
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.