History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zarn, Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.
304 N.C. 189
| N.C. | 1981
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel and the authorities there cited, we conclude that the petition was improvidently granted.

*191The order granting discretionary review is vacated; the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the actions of the trial court remains undisturbed.

Case Details

Case Name: Zarn, Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 6, 1981
Citation: 304 N.C. 189
Docket Number: No. 9
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.