History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zappone v. Delaney, No. 099518 (Jun. 24, 1991)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5039
| Conn. Super. Ct. | 1991
|
Check Treatment

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#103) After hearing held on defendant Alfred Ayotte, Jr.'s motion to dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED:

The plaintiffs have amended their complaint (#102) to correct a defect in the return date. Such amendment is permissible; 52-72(a), Conn. Gen. Stat.; and, when made, will withstand an attack by dismissal motion. Brandriff v. Sellas, 40 Conn. Super. Ct. 243 (1985).

The motion to dismiss is denied.

GAFFNEY, J. CT Page 5040

Case Details

Case Name: Zappone v. Delaney, No. 099518 (Jun. 24, 1991)
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Jun 24, 1991
Citation: 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5039
Docket Number: No. 099518
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.