History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zamora v. Warner
2:17-cv-01007
| W.D. Wash. | Feb 8, 2018
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE ISAAC LEE ZAMORA, Case No. C17-1007RSL Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

JACK WARNER,

Defendant. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s objections, Dkt. # 27, to the Report and Recommendation (R&R) by the Honorable James P. Donohue, Dkt. # 22. The R&R recommended denying two of plaintiff’s motions and stated that objections should be filed no later than November 22, 2017. Dkt. # 22 at 22. On December 13, 2017, the Court approved and adopted the R&R and denied plaintiff’s motions. Dkt. # 25. On December 21, 2017, plaintiff filed a letter stating: “You should have been the better. I do not agree with the Report biased Recommendation. I want stop of the actions. I agree with our President Donald Trump you and aleged court of civil rights is significant cost burden. I wanted equal chance[.]” Dkt. # 27. (mistakes in original). Construing the points in plaintiff’s letter as objections to the R&R, those objections are untimely because the letter was filed after November 22, 2017. In addition, the letter would not have changed the Court’s decision to approve and adopt the R&R and to deny plaintiff’s motions. Insofar as plaintiff intended the letter to be a Rule 60 motion for relief from the Court’s previously entered order, that motion is DENIED.

ORDER - 1 *2 DATED this 8th day of February, 2018.

A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge ORDER - 2

Case Details

Case Name: Zamora v. Warner
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Washington
Date Published: Feb 8, 2018
Docket Number: 2:17-cv-01007
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.