History
  • No items yet
midpage
Yvonne Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum
693 F. App'x 206
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne Pinkard, Appellant Pro Se. James Thomas Cromwell, SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; David Caldwell Hartnett, CRENSHAW WARE & MARTIN, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yvonne Pinkard appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum , No. 2:16-cv-00625-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 20, 2017 & entered Jan. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Yvonne Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 19, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: 17-1182
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.