History
  • No items yet
midpage
Young's Case
2 Cranch 453
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1824
Check Treatment
The Court (Morsell, J., contra,)

decided that they had a discretion, and refused to grant the license, as the object was to compel the bridge companies to take less toll than they are authorized by law to take. The bridge companies are liable to prosecution and forfeiture if they suffer their respective bridges to be out of repair; and if any one may keep a ferry along-side of them they may not be able to keep them in repair, and the companies may be destroyed, to the great injury of the public.

Note. The petitioner, or some other person, afterwards set up a ferry near the bridge, and the Court, by injunction, restrained him from receiving hire or reward for the transportation of persons, &c. across the branch.

Case Details

Case Name: Young's Case
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Apr 15, 1824
Citation: 2 Cranch 453
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.