Young v. State

58 Ala. 379 | Ala. | 1877

STONE, J.

We have carefully considered the many points urged in argument, why we should reverse the judgment of conviction in this case, and the result is that we find no error in the record. We consider it unnecessary to notice the questions in detail. See Ex parte Winston, 52 Ala. 419; Floyd v. The State, 55 Ala. 61; State v. Craton, 6 Ire. 164. We have fully considered the charges excepted to, and find no error in them. — Boots Coleman v. The State, at the present term.

Affirmed.