Young v. PolizziYoung v. Polizzi
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Frederick J. Scullin Jr.
Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendant Polizzi pursuant to
Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Hummel‘s July 11, 2018 Report-Recommendation and Order, see Dkt. No. 50, in which he recommended that the Court grant Defendant‘s motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 48. Plaintiff did not file a response in
“When a party does not object to a magistrate judge‘s report-recommendation, the court reviews that report-recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice.” Ward v. Lee, No. 9:16-CV-1224, 2018 WL 3574872, *1 (N.D.N.Y. July 25, 2018) (citation omitted). “After conducting this review, ‘the Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . . . recommendations made by the magistrate judge.“‘” Id. (quoting Linares v. Mahunik, No. 9:05-CV-625, 2009 WL 3165660, *10 (N.D.N.Y. July 16, 2009) (quoting
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Hummel‘s July 11, 2018 Report-Recommendation and Order for clear error and manifest injustice; and, finding none, the Court hereby
ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Hummel‘s July 11, 2018 Report-Recommendation and Order is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further
ORDERS that Defendant‘s motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 48, is GRANTED; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 16, 2018
Syracuse, New York
Frederick J. Scullin, Jr.
Senior United States District Judge