56 Pa. Super. 134 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1914
Opinion by
The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant corporation in its rolling mill, and brought suit to recover
It was not for the court to assume, and instruct the jury either way as a matter of law, that the contract did or did not exist. Where the existence or the terms of a contract, and not its validity or construction, is the issue, and the' evidence is conflicting, or the question
The judgment is affirmed.