206 N.W. 933 | Minn. | 1926
Just how the decedent came to his death is uncertain. It is a fair inference of fact that he fell from the ladder or scaffold. The evidence does not require a finding that, if he was there, he was in disobedience of orders. The direction of the defendant to him to wait might well enough be deemed a casual direction; and it does not follow, necessarily, that he had stepped aside from his employment at the time he met his death. He was at the time in the actual employ of the defendant, or in any event properly found as a fact to be so, and upon the premises where his work required his presence.
There is a suggestion in argument that he came to death through self-destruction. Apparently he was peculiar, but the theory of suicide is without much support, and nothing survives the adverse finding of the commission.
The finding that the death arose out of and in the course of the deceased's employment is sustained, and we think the finding well made.
Order affirmed. *475