30 N.Y. 134 | NY | 1864
This action was commenced to recover the amount of a promissory note. The defense was usury. The action was tried at the Onondaga circuit, in October, 1858, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff. No exceptions were taken to the charge by either party, and subsequently the judge who tried the case, upon the minutes, set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial. On appeal this order was affirmed at the general term, and the plaintiff now appeals to this court, and stipulates, if the order is affirmed, that judgment absolute may be rendered. The verdict was set aside as being against the weight of evidence, and on payment of costs by the defendants. Such an order is not reviewable, on appeal, by this court, and we have frequently so decided. The appeal presents no question of law for the determination of this court. A review of the correctness of the order made at the special term granting the new trial, on the ground that the verdict was *135
against the weight of evidence, would necessarily involve an examination of such evidence by this court. In Oldfield v. NewYork and Harlem Railroad Company (
MULLIN, J., also read an opinion in favor of dismissal. And all the other judges concurring, and agreeing that the judgment was right on the merits, appeal dismissed. *136