61 S.E. 624 | N.C. | 1908
The court overruled the demurrer, holding that the same was frivolous, and for that reason declined to allow defendant to answer same. Defendant excepted and appealed. The plaintiff filed a verified complaint and alleged that he, with one Pink Presnell, had entered into a valid contract with one J. Middleby, Jr., to cut into lumber all the merchantable timber on a tract of land known as the Listenbury tract, containing about 1,203 acres, at so much per thousand feet, and plaintiff had become the sole owner of Presnell's interest in the contract, and filed the contract as an exhibit, making the same a part of his complaint; that plaintiff entered on the performance of the contract and had been and was ready and willing to carry out the same according to the terms thereof; that some time after, to-wit, the latter part of May, said Middleby contracted to sell (35) said lands and timber growing thereon to B. E. Cogbell and D. A. Ritchie, and at said time said Cogbell and Ritchie expressly assumed said contract, expressed in Exhibit A, with this plaintiff, and expressly agreed to carry out the terms and provisions of same in the same manner as Middleby had obligated himself to do; that these parties did comply with said contract in all substantial particulars until October, 1906, when the defendant company "took over the contract from the said Cogbell and Ritchie and expressly agreed with the said Middleby, Jr., to carry out said contract and every feature thereof" with this plaintiff until all the timber on said tract should be cut, etc.; that plaintiff continued to cut and saw timber, according to the terms of the contract, after defendant company acquired the ownership of said *27 land and timber and assumed the liabilities and obligations of the contract, until defendant, in June, 1907, forbade plaintiff from sawing said timber or further complying with the contract concerning it; that at the time defendant wrongfully forced plaintiff to stop cutting there was a large amount of timber uncut, to the extent of over six million feet, and plaintiff was greatly damaged, etc., by defendant's wrong.
The demurrer of defendant was to the effect that the complaint does not show facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that no contract or agreement is alleged between plaintiff and defendant. We have held, in the case of Biggers v. Matthews,
We have had occasion, in R. R. v. R. R.,
Reversed.
Cited: Herring v. Lumber Co.,
(37)