History
  • No items yet
midpage
York v. Social Security Administration, US
707 F. App'x 132
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William C. York, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William C. York appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because York’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, York has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: York v. Social Security Administration, US
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 21, 2017
Citation: 707 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: 17-2280
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.