24 Wash. 483 | Wash. | 1901
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Action of unlawful detainer. The material allegations of the complaint are that on the 15th of October, 1898, plaintiff was, and at all times since
“You are notified to leave the described premises at the expiration of the present month of your tenancy, May 31, 1899, and that your tenancy will be and is hereby terminated at the expiration of said month of May,. 1899. ”
It is averred that, upon the expiration of the said month of May, plaintiff demanded of defendant to quit and surrender possession of the premises to plaintiff, but defendant neglected and refused to' quit or surrender. There is an allegation of damages sustained by the unlawful detainer by defendant. There was judgment for plaintiff. Mo bill of exceptions or statement of facts is in the record. The only question suggested by counsel for defendant is the sufficiency of the complaint; that is, it is urged that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The law governing actions for forcible detainer and unlawful de~
Eullebton, Dunbab, Andebs and White, JJ., concur.