Yentis v. Mills
291 Pa. 591
Pa.
1928
Check Treatment

Argued January 4, 1928. The court below refused to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

*Page 1