History
  • No items yet
midpage
Yenne v. Folsom
16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1021
New York Court of Common Pleas
1888
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the jury has erred in its judgment in deciding the amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff. The damages are clearly excessive. We have therefore concluded to make a conditional order reversing the judgment, and granting a new trial, unless the plaintiff will consent to reduce the damages to the sum of $750, and affirming it for that amount if the plaintiff shall consent to such reduction.

Case Details

Case Name: Yenne v. Folsom
Court Name: New York Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: May 18, 1888
Citation: 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1021
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.