History
  • No items yet
midpage
Yeager v. Bloomington Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inc.
604 N.E.2d 598
Ind.
1992
Check Treatment
KRAHULIK, Justice.

The defendants seek transfer after the Court of Appeals reversed summary judgments entered in their favor and held that Seott Yeager's proposed complaint be permitted to proceed before the medical review panel. Yeager v. Bloomington Obstetrics (1992), Ind.App., 585 N.E.2d 696. Defendants urge us to accept transfer in order to resolve the conflict that exists between that opinion and the Court of Appeals' opinion in Walker v. Rinck (1991), Ind.App., 566 N.E.2d 1088. For the reasons set forth in our opinion granting transfer in Walker v. Rinck (1992), Ind., 604 N.E.2d 591, we agree with the Court of Appeals' opinion rendered in this case.

Accordingly, we grant transfer, summarily affirm the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions that Scott Yeager's proposed complaint be permitted to proceed before the medical review panel.

DeBRULER, GIVAN and DICKSON, JJ., concur. SHEPARD, C.J., dissents for reasons explained in his dissenting opinion in Walker v. Rinck.

Case Details

Case Name: Yeager v. Bloomington Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inc.
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 2, 1992
Citation: 604 N.E.2d 598
Docket Number: 53S01-9212-CV-951
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.