History
  • No items yet
midpage
Yates v. Batteford
139 So. 746
La. Ct. App.
1932
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Due to a miscalculation on our part the decree rendered by us, among other things, condemned Batteford, defendant, to pay to Yates, plaintiff, the sum of $373.30, with interest, etc.. The amount should have been $420, with interest, etc., instead of $373.30.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree rendered by us on January 11, 1932, be and it is amended so as to correct the figures $373.30 as they appear in the original decree to read $420.00.

The rehearing requested is refused.

Rehearing refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Yates v. Batteford
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 15, 1932
Citation: 139 So. 746
Docket Number: No. 13828
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.