Yamonaco v. FeyYamonaco v. Fey
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order confirming the Support Magistrate‘s determination that he willfully violated a prior order to pay child support with respect to the parties’ child and sentencing him to a term of six months in jail. We affirm. It is well settled that a parent is presumed to be able to support his or her minor children (see
Great deference should be given to the determination of the Support Magistrate (see Matter of Manocchio v Manocchio, 16 AD3d 1126, 1128 [2005]). Here, petitioner mother established that the father willfully violated the prior order by demonstrating that the father had not made the required child support payments. The father failed to meet his burden to present sufficient evidence of his inability to make such payments, inasmuch as he failed to offer competent medical evidence to substantiate that claim. Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.