History
  • No items yet
midpage
Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville
280 U.S. 531
SCOTUS
1930
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers'whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for. certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial- Code, as amended by the Act of February *53213, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Walter L. Tooze, Jr., for appellant. Mr. John P. Kavanaugh for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 20, 1930
Citation: 280 U.S. 531
Docket Number: No. 470
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.