No. 470 | SCOTUS | Jan 20, 1930

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1912-06-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/shulthis-v-mcdougal-97678?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97678">225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1914-06-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hall-v-burr-98261?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="98261">234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1915-11-29" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/norton-v-whiteside-98563?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="98563">239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers'whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for. certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial- Code, as amended by the Act of February *53213, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Walter L. Tooze, Jr., for appellant. Mr. John P. Kavanaugh for appellees.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.