History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wyse v. McKinney
179 S.E. 860
Ga. Ct. App.
1935
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

Under the facts of this case, and the rulings in Coral Cables Corporation v. Hamilton, 168 Ga. 182 (147 S. E. 494), the demurrers to the answer as amended were properly overruled; and the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs. Guerry, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Gtjekry, J.,

dissenting. A rescission for fraud must show an offer to rescind as soon as the fraud is discovered. In my opinion the answer was defective in this respect and was subject to the demurrers interposed. Furthermore, the defendant had sold the property to third parties, and could not rescind by putting the parties in statu quo. I think that the Coral Gables Corporation case, cited in the majority opinion, is distinguished by its facts from this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Wyse v. McKinney
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 30, 1935
Citation: 179 S.E. 860
Docket Number: 24309
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.