History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wunderlich v. Southern Const. Co.
174 So. 318
Ala.
1937
Check Treatment

This cause comes before us on petition of Martin Wunderlich for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals, to review and revise the opinion and judgment of that court in the case of Martin Wunderlich v. Southern Construction Company, Inc.,27 Ala. App. 458, 174 So. 317.

We have uniformly held that we would not review the evidence, as contained in the record, to determine for ourselves what the facts of the case really were, but would accept and act upon the finding of the facts as made by the Court of Appeals.

The Court of Appeals has properly applied the law of the case to the facts as found by them, and we must, therefore, deny the writ prayed for.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wunderlich v. Southern Const. Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 13, 1937
Citation: 174 So. 318
Docket Number: 6 Div. 135.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.