Wright v. Wright, 516 So. 2d 9

Wright v. Wright

516 So. 2d 9

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1987

Check Treatment

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the report of the general master is supported by competent evidence. See Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“A trial court is bound by a master’s factual findings when they are supported by competent evidence.”); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (trial court must uphold master’s findings unless report was clearly erroneous or master misconceived legal effect of evidence).

Affirmed.