History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wright v. Wright
129 So. 2d 164
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1961
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant husband seeks review of a post decretal order in a divorce action in which the chancellor refused to change the custody of minor children from the appel-lee wife to the appellant, and awarded certain support and alimony.

The appellant’s main contention here is based on the failure of the evidence and testimony to support the chancellor’s action. The record brought to this court contains only the deposition of the appellant. The appellant’s brief refers to other evidence and testimony, but such evidence and testimony do not appear as a part of this record. See Greene v. Hoiriis, Fla.App.1958, 103 So.2d 226, 227, and cases cited therein.

Upon the record presented, we fail to find that the chancellor erred. Accordingly the decree appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wright v. Wright
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 1, 1961
Citation: 129 So. 2d 164
Docket Number: No. 60-453
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.