OPINION
Richard Chester Wright appeals a pretrial order revoking his bond. Appellant was arrested for felony driving while intoxicated and released on bond January 10,1997. The State subsequently moved to revoke appellant’s bond for failure to comply with conditions of bail. After hearing, appellant’s bond was revoked, giving rise to this appeal. The State contends that because the order revoking bond is an interlocutory order, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. We agree.
As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only after conviction.
See Ex parte Shumake,
• appeals while on unadjudicated community supervision, see Kirk v. State,942 S.W.2d 624 , 625 (Tex.Crim.App.1997); Dillehey v. State,815 S.W.2d 623 , 626 (Tex.Crim.App.1991);
• denial of a motion to reduce bond, see Tex.R.App. P. 31.1 (former rule 44(a)); Clark v. Barr,827 S.W.2d 556 , 557 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992);
• denial of habeas corpus relief in extradition cases, see McPherson v. State,752 S.W.2d 178 , 179 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, pet. ref'd, untimely filed);
• denial of habeas corpus relief while on unadjudicated community supervision, see Ex parte McCullough,966 S.W.2d 529 , 531 (Tex.Crim.App.1998);
• denial of pretrial applications of writs of habeas corpus alleging double jeopardy, see Ex parte Robinson,641 S.W.2d 552 , 555 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1982).
This appeal does not fall within one of the exceptions to the rule, nor are we in-
*590
dined to construe rule 31.1 of the rules of appellate procedure to encompass a direct appeal of a pretrial order revoking bond.
See
Tex.R.App. P. 31.1;
see also Ex parte Shumake,
Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
