History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wright v. Gray
20 Ala. 363
Ala.
1852
Check Treatment
PHELAN, J.

The court below dismissed the certiorari, on the motion of the defendant, upon the ground that the petition was defective and insufficient; and this is assigned for error.

Upon looking into the petition, we find no cause or excuse set forth, why the plaintiff in error, who was also plaintiff below, did not appeal from the judgment of the justice of the peace against him; and for this reason, the prayer for a cer-tiorari should have been refused. But when a certiorari is awarded, even if it be upon a petition not setting forth such a state of facts as would properly justify its issuance, the Circuit Court, in pursuance of'the plain requirements of the statute, must proceed with the trial ck novo, without regarding the defects in the petition. The case of Casey v. Bryant, (1 Stew. & P. 51) is decisive of this case.

Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Wright v. Gray
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1852
Citation: 20 Ala. 363
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.