History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wright v. Eckle
76 Ohio Law. Abs. 323
Ohio Ct. App.
1957
Check Treatment

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Petitioner requests the court “in conformity with provisions of the Constitution of Ohio and the provisions of the U. S. Federal Statute, Title 28, Section 1915. (D), to appoint counsel to represent petitioner

in this action.”

There is no provision in the Constitution of Ohio or by statute for *324the appointment of counsel for an indigent petitioner in an action in habeas corpus. The Federal Statute which petitioner cites does not control procedure in Ohio courts.

The motion will be denied.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN, J, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wright v. Eckle
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 14, 1957
Citation: 76 Ohio Law. Abs. 323
Docket Number: No. 227
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.