History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wright v. Chapin
33 N.Y.S. 1068
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1895
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The defendant seems to be greatly distressed by the fear that, in case he pays this judgment, the plaintiff may decamp with the money, and the defendant left to pay the Canadian judgment of a like amount. Should the defendant pay the Canadian judgment, and so relieve the plaintiff in this action from his liability on his covenant to George Goodwin, there might be a way found of reducing the present judgment by the amount paid on the Canadian judgment, without making double payment. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of this court reported in 74 Hun, 521, 26 N. Y. Supp. 825, and on the opinion of Mr. Justice INGRAHAM rendered on the trial of this action.

Case Details

Case Name: Wright v. Chapin
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 17, 1895
Citation: 33 N.Y.S. 1068
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In