History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wright v. Boyd
96 Ga. 745
Ga.
1895
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

Where a judgment of contempt has been rendered by the superior court against one of its officers and the same has not been reviewed and affirmed by the Supreme Court, the lower court, upon a proper case made, may go behind the judgment and look into the truth of the case, and in its discretion re-examine the same. Kingsbery v. Ryan, 92 Ga. 115, and cases there cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Respondent demurred to the petition, on the grounds that it was barred .by the statute of limitations, and that the matters set up therein were res ad judicata. The demurrer was overruled, the rule absolute reopened and set aside for future review and reconsideration, and the attachment founded thereon was annulled. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and Howard Thompson, solicitor-general, for plaintiff in error. W. A. Charters, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Wright v. Boyd
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 25, 1895
Citation: 96 Ga. 745
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.