Wortendyke v. Rayot

88 N.J. Eq. 344 | N.J. | 1917

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin in the opinion filed in the court below, and reported in 87 N. J. Eq. 159.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Beroten, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13. For reversal — None.