History
  • No items yet
midpage
Worrill v. Coker
40 Ga. 582
Ga.
1869
Check Treatment

(McCay, having been of counsel below, did not preside.)

This was an injunction from Sumter. The bill of exceptions showed nothing but the action of the Chancellor as to the injunction. When the cause was called here for argument, counsel for plaintiff in error did not furnish the Court or Reporter with any brief abstract of the facts of the case as they existed in the record, as required by the 12th rule of this Court. For that reason the writ of error was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu. See 38th Ga. R., 690.

Case Details

Case Name: Worrill v. Coker
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1869
Citation: 40 Ga. 582
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.