32:T49f,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Workman v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 793","datePublished":"1928-12-31","legislationDate":"1928-12-31","citation":"Workman v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 793 (Cal. 1928)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"California Supreme Court","description":"Read the full text of Workman v. Kingsbury (Workman v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 793 (Cal. 1928)). This legal opinion, filed in 1928-12-31, from the California Supreme Court discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/workman-v-kingsbury--3302781"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/workman-v-kingsbury--3302781","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Workman v. Kingsbury, California Supreme Court, Workman v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 793 (Cal. 1928)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T40d,

THE COURT.

[1] For the reason assigned and upon the grounds stated in our opinion this day filed, in which *Page 794 we considered together cases S.F. Nos. 12707 to 12766, both inclusive, ante, p. 148 [273 P. 797], the application of Charles M. Workman for a writ of mandamus commanding the surveyor-general of the state of California and ex-officio register of the state land office to issue to him a permit to prospect for oil and gas upon the lands described in his said petition, wherein said lands are included within the boundaries of lands described in the respective petitions of Boone and Shudde, as therein considered, is denied and the petition is dismissed.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.