Wooten v. Brevard County
278 U.S. 581
SCOTUS
1929
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed (1) for want of a substantial federal question on.the authority of Shul*582this v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316-317; (2) because the affirmance below was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. L. C. Crofton for appellee in support of the'motion; Messrs. W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams, and Henry C. Clark for appellant in opposition thereto.