History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woolum v. Kelton
52 Ark. 445
Ark.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Execution: Motion to quash. The questions arising upon the motion to quash the execution, should have been tried by the court, but were, by consent, submitted to a jury. The evidence was conflicting, and their finding will not be disturbed.

But upon finding against appellant upon his motion to quash the executions, the court rendered judgment against him and the sureties upon an appeal bond for the amount of the justice’s judgments. This was error.

Reverse the judgment and enter judgment here against the appellant and his sureties for the costs of the justice’s and Circuit Court.

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Woolum v. Kelton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 15, 1889
Citation: 52 Ark. 445
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.