History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woolston's Appeal
51 Pa. 452
Pa.
1866
Check Treatment

The opinion was delivered

Per Curiam.

The law governing the case was accurately applied by the auditor to the facts found by him, and we could not profitably add anything to what he has so well said in his report. Nor do we think there is any good ground of complaint of the finding of the auditor, against the allegation that Plumly was on the eve of entering into a hazardous business when he made the settlement. We think the testimony furnished no other proper conclusion than was drawn from it by the auditor, and that therefore the court committed no error in confirming the report, either upon this or the other grounds complained of.

Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Woolston's Appeal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 8, 1866
Citation: 51 Pa. 452
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.