41 Minn. 235 | Minn. | 1889
The plaintiff William J. Woolsey is engaged in business as a contractor for the construction of buildings. He having contracted for the erection of a certain building, he executed a bond
Exhibit 1, received in evidence, was a statement of account between the parties on the 29th of January, including a part of the
It was error to have received the journals in evidence, for the reason that the charges offered from these books were not, as required by statute, “original entries, * * * made at the time of the
The offer to show by the testimony of the plaintiff that the amount of certain kinds of lumber charged in the defendants’ lien account exceeded by $200 in value the amount “required” for the building, according to the plans and drawings, was properly excluded. The evidence offered did not go to show that the whole amount charged
Order affirmed.