History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woodyard v. Eischen
0:25-cv-01297
| D. Minnesota | Jun 30, 2025
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 CASE 0:25-cv-01297-LMP-DLM Doc. 6 Filed 06/30/25 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No. 25-cv-1297 (LMP/DLM) BLAKE WOODYARD,

Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. EISCHEN and FPC DULUTH,

Respondents.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 5, of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko, which recommends denying Petitioner Blake Woodyard’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon , 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT :

1. The R&R (ECF No. 5) is ADOPTED ;

CASE 0:25-cv-01297-LMP-DLM Doc. 6 Filed 06/30/25 Page 2 of 2 2. Mr. Woodyard’s Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED . [1] LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: June 30, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

[1] Mr. Woodyard asked in his habeas petition that the Court direct the BOP to transfer him to a facility that offers RDAP, which the Court cannot do. But the Court notes that, according to the BOP Inmate Locator, Mr. Woodyard is now at FCI-Lewisburg, which offers the RDAP Program. Bureau of Prisons, Residential Drug Abuse Programs (RDAP) and Locations , https://perma.cc/TH5X-AA3X. 2

Case Details

Case Name: Woodyard v. Eischen
Court Name: District Court, D. Minnesota
Date Published: Jun 30, 2025
Docket Number: 0:25-cv-01297
Court Abbreviation: D. Minnesota
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.