Filed 4/8/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Scott Alan Kruckenberg, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20120387
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail H. Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kent M. Morrow (on brief), P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for petitioner and appellant.
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney (on brief), Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for respondent and appellee.
Kruckenberg v. State
No. 20120387
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Scott Kruckenberg appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his post-
conviction relief application alleging the State did not comply with the habitual offender statute resulting in an illegal sentence and ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
[¶2] Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-09(5), a presentence investigation is mandatory unless extraordinary circumstances exist, and the failure to conduct a presentence investigation is legal error. Here, Kruckenberg failed to object at his sentencing hearing, limiting our review to obvious error.
See
State v. Nikle
,
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Allan L. Schmalenberger, S.J.
[¶4] The Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, S.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
